If you prefer a private conversation with Arducam, go to our Contact Center. The posting rules aim to help you better articulate your questions and be descriptive enough to get help.Īny topic that fails to comply with the posting rules will be unapproved starting from. Something (parts editor os a good candidate!) inserted some groups in to the copper0 group.Here are our forum rules to comply with if you want to post a new topic: Arducam posting rules I’ll replace it withe the original correct pcb svg rather than try and fix it. It is missing all the connectors and is dimensioned in px.
That isn’t the pcb svg that is in the original file. I see what you mean about no holes in pcb, something went wrong. The pcb svg is dimensioned in px (FritzingCheckPart flagged it) rather than inches so correct that. The fzp file still has the layerId as breadboard, so the breadboard svg layerId would have been wrong (FritzingCheckPart.py would have complained about it.) So see if this works in Illustrator and we should be good to go. See of Illustrator likes this svg I guess. Where the xml:space=“preserve” is probably what Illustrator was unhappy about being deleted in the original svg. I have renamed all the connecotrxxpin_yy to polygon-123 and moved all the connectors to the bottom, then regrouped (but left the space:preserve) Įnable-background="new 0 0 245.968 164.34" For the same reason, I removed all instances like this I would like to see all Fritzing svgs end up this way to allow tools to easily manipulate the svgs. The reason being that I have python scripts (as yet unpublished) that will number the connectors (when it finds the first item with an id of “connector”) in sequential order which reduces the work of defining connectors or renumbering them to add connectors in the middle. It is desirable that all the connectors be at the very bottom of the svg in group schematic like this LayerId should be breadboard (not breadboardbreadboard which is specific to breadboards and may trigger unexpected code) As I said this is the only oblong pad that I know of that works in Fritzing (at least and drills holes in gerber output.) I’ll look over your changes now. As a bonus, changing the radius of the circle will change the hole size (at least in Inkscape) easily without having to recalculate the path to change the size of the circle. In this case there are the paths (46 of them) then 46 circles (which are the connectors) which over lay the paths. Every thing I have tried with oblong paths with holes in them doesn’t drill the holes in gerber processing. You can make a circle as a path, and gerber will drill a hole. So far as I know you can’t make oblong pins as a single path. And, In pcb, I don’t understand why there is no hole on pins…? Is it ok?
0 kommentar(er)
